The author is the minister of foreign affairs of the Republic of the Sudan.

ISTANBUL 

Fifteen months of the RSF militia's war against the Sudanese people, and the associated unprecedented atrocities have so far met inadequate response from the international community.

True, the UN Security Council’s Resolution 2736, June 13, 2024, which demands the RSF end its siege of El-Fasher is significant. However, it falls short of unequivocally condemning the Militia for its brutal crimes.

Between April and December 2023, the RSF and its affiliated militias were responsible for the deaths of 10,000 to 15,000 civilians in West Darfur, according to a Panel of Independent Experts assigned by the Security Council. The US State Department determined in December 2023 that the RSF committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, and acts of ethnic cleansing reminiscent of genocide. A bipartisan draft resolution in the US Congress also recognized these actions as genocide.

On June 5, 2024, another carnage took place in Wad-al-Nora village, Al-Gazira state. Around 270 villagers were slaughtered. Despite global outrage over these crimes, in many aspects, the international community's response appears slaw, insufficient and amounts to apathy.

Apathy encourages impunity

The result is continued and unchecked ethnic cleansing and killings by the Militia in different parts of the country. The latest UN resolution and international condemnations essentially call for the RSF to behave themselves. This soft approach mistakenly assumes the Militia possesses a level of morality, legitimacy or discipline. It lacks none of The RSF’s response to the resolution; a major attack on El-Fasher, demonstrates its disregard for international diplomacy.

Short memory?

Historically, the Janjaweed were globally known for their brutality in the Darfur conflict, with their crimes leading to the International Criminal Court's involvement in 2005. Yet, certain Western quarters seem to have forgotten that the RSF is essentially an upgraded version of the Janjaweed, as the Enough Project puts it. Various international publications equally recall that the RSF evolved from the Janjaweed, infamous for ethnic cleansing and genocide. Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, explains "The RSF grew out of, and is primarily composed of, the Janjaweed militias."

Nevertheless, the leader of the Janjaweed, Hemeti, has been elevated to an international figure, receiving calls from the UN Secretary-General and the US Secretary of State, given a red-carpet reception by a pro-West East African president, and even invited to an IGAD summit. This occurs even as the RSF militia continues its atrocities now spanning, beside Darfur, Al-Gazira, Greater Kordofan, Khartoum, and Sennar states, fully backed by its wealthy regional sponsor, the UAE, which supplies advanced weaponry, mercenaries, finance, and extensive PR and propaganda networks.

Thus, compared to its response to the Janjaweed crimes during the Darfur conflict 2003-2009, the international community seems this time around indifferent towards their renewed atrocities, though the current victims constitute almost half of the Sudanese population.

Changing context

Hemeti's rise to the post of Deputy President of the Sovereignty Council occurred during an extremely difficult transitional period following the ousting of the former regime by a popular uprising. As the nation emerged from multiple conflicts and with a view to minimizing any resistance to the change that would exacerbate the already precarious situation, the RSF had to be accommodated, along with the very armed struggle movements whom it had been fighting on behalf of the former regime. It was envisaged then that such arrangements would usher the country into a new dispensation based on a broader national accord. Accordingly, RSF was supposed to be integrated into the national army, SAF, after being reformed and rehabilitated, under the supervision of the latter. However, meddling in the process from both external powers and local politicians aborted this effort, strengthening the RSF instead. Thanks to its regional sponsor and appropriation of the bigger part of the country's gold wealth, the Militia now boasts advanced weaponry, significant economic control, and a PR network. Sudan was a few steps away from joining the list of Middle Eastern countries that are effectively run by militias.

With the heavy losses in manpower, it suffered early in the war, the Militia has reverted to its Janjaweed origins, especially after the termination of SAF officer secondments and voluntary demobilizations within the RSF. Hemeti was removed from his post in May 2023, and the RSF was disbanded by the SAF Commander in September 2023. Therefore, it is Janjaweed unmasked who are now fighting the Sudanese people.

Courting the beast

Certain European powers began courting the RSF before the former regime fell, to help control irregular migration through Darfur and Libya. These dealings gave Hemeti pseudo-legitimacy and significant revenue, facilitating the recruitment of mercenaries, including illegal immigrants attracted by high pay.

Military victory against terrorism

The notion that "there is no military victory in this war" deserves scrutiny. While war is undesirable, defending against aggression is a right and duty. Historical precedents, such as the defeat of Nazism, Fascism, and Daesh/ISIS, show that military action can be necessary and effective. Thus, the question should be how, and not whether the war against terrorism is won. The SAF is currently winning the war against the RSF militia, which now resorts to targeting remote villages and small towns, displaying tactics typical of terrorist groups like Daesh/ISIS and Boko Haram.

People's resistance and the right to self-defense

Criticism of arming willing civilians for self-defense against the RSF is misplaced. The right to self-defense is fundamental, especially in a vast, underdeveloped country like Sudan facing a terrorist militia. International precedents support the legitimacy of people's resistance against colonial or terrorist forces.

In summary, the international community's soft approach to the Janjaweed RSF and its leader Hemeti is counterproductive, given the Militia's history and current actions. A firmer stance is needed to address the Janjaweed’s renewed crimes and support Sudan's fight against this terrorist group.

*Opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Anadolu