ANKARA

The passage of a Waqf amendment bill in the Indian parliament is facing legal challenges as two lawmakers from opposition parties have petitioned the Supreme Court, challenging the amendments.

Opposition Congress party member Mohammad Jawed said the legislation, “imposes arbitrary restrictions on Waqf properties and their management, thereby undermining the religious autonomy of the Muslim community.”

Asaduddin Owaisi, who is president of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen, also petitioned in the court saying the amendment takes way the “protection accorded to the Waqf under Article 26 of the Constitution while retaining such protection for religious and charitable endowments of other religions,” Indian legal website Live law reported Friday.

The main opposition Congress party had on Friday said it will challenge in the Supreme Court the Waqf Amendment Bill, which has been hailed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a major milestone for reform and transparency.

The controversial bill, which applies to Waqf - land or property donated by Muslims for religious, educational, or charitable purposes — passed both houses of Parliament despite sharp resistance from opposition parties and Muslim organizations.

Early Friday, the bill cleared the upper house, the Rajya Sabha, after it was introduced by the Modi-led government amid mounting political and social opposition.

As the bill was passed, protests took place in several places in the country against the bill.

Senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh confirmed on Friday the party would “very soon be challenging in the Supreme Court the constitutionality of the Wakf (Amendment) Bill, 2024.”

His comments came shortly after Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge condemned the bill, saying it had been introduced to “harass the minorities.” Kharge criticized the manner of its passage, noting that during the vote in the lower house, or Lok Sabha, 288 lawmakers supported it while 232 opposed.

“When this bill was passed in the Lok Sabha late at night, 288 votes were cast in its favour and 232 against it. Why did this happen? This means that there are many flaws in the bill,” Kharge wrote on X. "From this, we can guess that despite opposition from various parties, this bill was brought arbitrarily."

The legislation has drawn strong condemnation from Muslim civil society groups. Jamaat-e-Islami Hind called it “a direct assault on religious freedom and constitutional rights.”

“The passage is highly condemnable,” the group’s president, Syed Sadatullah Husaini, said in a statement, accusing the government of undermining the rights of minority communities.

However, Modi and members of his ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) defended the legislation as a move toward greater transparency and equity.

In a statement on X, Modi said the bill’s passage marked “a watershed moment in our collective quest for socio-economic justice, transparency and inclusive growth.”

“This will particularly help those who have long remained on the margins, thus being denied both voice and opportunity,” he said, adding that the waqf system had for decades lacked “transparency and accountability.”

“We will now enter an era where the framework will be more modern and sensitive to social justice,” Modi added. “On a larger note, we remain committed to prioritising the dignity of every citizen. This is also how we build a stronger, more inclusive and more compassionate India.”